Search for: All records

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) that target the pathological BCR-ABL1 fusion oncogene. The objective of this statistical meta-analysis was to assess the prevalence of other hematological adverse events (AEs) that occur during or after predominantly first-line treatment with TKIs. Data from seventy peer-reviewed, published studies were included in the analysis. Hematological AEs were assessed as a function of TKI drug type (dasatinib, imatinib, bosutinib, nilotinib) and CML phase (chronic, accelerated, blast). AE prevalence aggregated across all severities and phases was significantly different between each TKI (p < 0.05) for anemia—dasatinib (54.5%), bosutinib (44.0%), imatinib (32.8%), nilotinib (11.2%); neutropenia—dasatinib (51.2%), imatinib (29.8%), bosutinib (14.1%), nilotinib (14.1%); thrombocytopenia—dasatinib (62.2%), imatinib (30.4%), bosutinib (35.3%), nilotinib (22.3%). AE prevalence aggregated across all severities and TKIs was significantly (p < 0.05) different between CML phases for anemia—chronic (28.4%), accelerated (66.9%), blast (55.8%); neutropenia—chronic (26.7%), accelerated (63.8%), blast (36.4%); thrombocytopenia—chronic (33.3%), accelerated (65.6%), blast (37.9%). An odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval was used to compare hematological AE prevalence of each TKI compared to the most common first-line TKI therapy, imatinib. For anemia, dasatinib OR = 1.65, [1.51, 1.83]; bosutinib OR = 1.34, [1.16, 1.54]; nilotinib OR = 0.34, [0.30, 0.39]. For neutropenia, dasatinib OR = 1.72, [1.53, 1.92]; bosutinib OR = 0.47, [0.38, 0.58]; nilotinib OR = 0.47, [0.42, 0.54]. For thrombocytopenia, dasatinib OR = 2.04, [1.82, 2.30]; bosutinib OR = 1.16, [0.97, 1.39]; nilotinib OR = 0.73, [0.65, 0.82]. Nilotinib had the greatest fraction of severe (grade 3/4) hematological AEs (30%). In conclusion, the overall prevalence of hematological AEs by TKI type was: dasatinib > bosutinib > imatinib > nilotinib. Study limitations include inability to normalize for dosage and treatment duration. 

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are prescribed for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and some other cancers. The objective was to predict and rank TKI-related adverse events (AEs), including under-reported or preclinical AEs, using novel text mining. First, k-means clustering of 2575 clinical CML TKI abstracts separated TKIs by significant (p < 0.05) AE type: gastrointestinal (bosutinib); edema (imatinib); pulmonary (dasatinib); diabetes (nilotinib); cardiovascular (ponatinib). Next, we propose a novel cross-domain text mining method utilizing a knowledge graph, link prediction, and hub node network analysis to predict new relationships. Cross-domain text mining of 30+ million articles via SemNet predicted and ranked known and novel TKI AEs. Three physiology-based tiers were formed using unsupervised rank aggregation feature importance. Tier 1 ranked in the top 1%: hematology (anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, hypocellular marrow); glucose (diabetes, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome); iron (deficiency, overload, metabolism), cardiovascular (hypertension, heart failure, vascular dilation); thyroid (hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, parathyroid). Tier 2 ranked in the top 5%: inflammation (chronic inflammatory disorder, autoimmune, periodontitis); kidney (glomerulonephritis, glomerulopathy, toxic nephropathy). Tier 3 ranked in the top 10%: gastrointestinal (bowel regulation, hepatitis, pancreatitis); neuromuscular (autonomia, neuropathy, muscle pain); others (secondary cancers, vitamin deficiency, edema). Results suggest proactive TKI patient AE surveillance levels: regular surveillance for tier 1, infrequent surveillance for tier 2, and symptom-based surveillance for tier 3. 

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the frontline therapy for BCR-ABL (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). A systematic meta-analysis of 43 peer-reviewed studies with 10,769 CML patients compared the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events (GI AEs) in a large heterogeneous CML population as a function of TKI type. Incidence and severity of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were assessed for imatinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, and nilotinib. Examination of combined TKI average GI AE incidence found diarrhea most prevalent (22.5%), followed by nausea (20.6%), and vomiting (12.9%). Other TKI GI AEs included constipation (9.2%), abdominal pain (7.6%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (3.5%), and pancreatitis (2.2%). Mean GI AE incidence was significantly different between TKIs (p < 0.001): bosutinib (52.9%), imatinib (24.2%), dasatinib (20.4%), and nilotinib (9.1%). Diarrhea was the most prevalent GI AE with bosutinib (79.2%) and dasatinib (28.1%), whereas nausea was most prevalent with imatinib (33.0%) and nilotinib (13.2%). Incidence of grade 3 or 4 severe GI AEs was ≤3% except severe diarrhea with bosutinib (9.5%). Unsupervised clustering revealed treatment efficacy measured by the complete cytogenetic response, major molecular response, and overall survival is driven most by disease severity, not TKI type. For patients with chronic phase CML without resistance, optimal TKI selection should consider TKI AE profile, comorbidities, and lifestyle.